Remove Documentation Remove Labelling Remove White Paper
article thumbnail

The Incredible Shrinking Exemption: FDA Final CDS Guidance Would Significantly Narrow the Scope of Exempt Clinical Decision Support Software Under the Cures Act

The FDA Law Blog

Javitt — On September 28, 2022, the FDA issued the long anticipated final Clinical Decision Support Software Guidance (CDS Guidance), which replaces the revised draft guidance document from 2019. The final guidance focuses on labeling as a means to effectuate Criterion 4. software or labeling.

FDA 52
article thumbnail

Pharma 4.0™ Is Gaining Momentum and Driving Innovation

ISPE

™” is becoming an increasingly rhetorical one, particularly in view of the growing momentum in the pharmaceutical industry and in various statements and white papers from key regulatory agencies. Is the vendors’ documentation complete in order to assess GxP risks and GxP compliance? The upcoming Pharma 4.0™

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Proposal for a Comprehensive Quality Overall Summary

ISPE

Concept Paper: M4Q(R2) Common Technical Document on Quality Guideline.” Ultimately, the summary was not adopted during the QbD pilot, but was reintroduced in 2014 when a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) team prepared a white paper describing the content and format of an improved Module 2.

article thumbnail

A Proposal for a Comprehensive Quality Overall Summary

ISPE

Concept Paper: M4Q(R2) Common Technical Document on Quality Guideline.” Ultimately, the summary was not adopted during the QbD pilot, but was reintroduced in 2014 when a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) team prepared a white paper describing the content and format of an improved Module 2.

article thumbnail

Exforge antitrust settlement caps Novartis’ year of legal disputes

Pharmaceutical Technology

According to the legal documents , the plaintiffs accused the companies of “violating federal antitrust laws, alleging “per se” and “rule of reason” violations”. Novartis argued that the early release of Entresto generics could cause labelling inconsistencies.